The hand blame the blood donation, and gay men and the women of transgender having sex with men (GBT people), is one step closer to being lifted.
The life’s life service, or readily lodge the subscriptions of the ownership goods (TGA) people ask that people, or who have no anal people, be allowed to give blood.
If approved, each donore, gay and straight, cisgerator, they will be required the same question about yourself anxograph They say “no” can donate.
For the first time advention of the bloodline of the bloodline to the 1980s Following Follows to be screens to the security of his sexual activity, not sexual partner.
This proposal the policy opens a safe blood source, you will make bloodless blood sake and bring more pillars in the UK, we are so much other countries.
All those who kill people, and our allies, which are advised for a blood donor system you feel proud.
However, there is likely to be a tip in the tail of the position of LifeBlood.
From what I understand, life asked you to double the period of abstinence for those who do not describe under the new policy before you don’t donate.
Currently, all of the sexual sex breasts, you must refrain from sex for three months before donating.
Now life’s life offers a period of six months of six months for those having sex anal in new or multiple relationships.
Place another way, if you have any anal sex, you have to be in a monogic relationship for at least six months to be able to donate.
At the same time as life is given a green light for GBT people who are monogues or have no anal sex, the oscillations were put in which these criteria.
You don’t make me wrong, the medical evidence is clear for an abstinence period with anal sex with the partners of the new or multiple, but they are dumped by the out of six months more than three.
If approved, the new six-month refrain period would mean that some people who can currently donate may no longer.
This included GBT people who had anal sex with his male partner more than three months before donating, which will now have to wait for six.
Also include heterosexual and the cisgender women in anal sex.
If, as Lifloud loved us tell us, these people are currently injured, why is it right necessary to transprish them?
Then there is the problem of continued discrimination.
Although life’s proposal policy is ostensibly not discriminatory, affects a much larger proportion of GBT people who’s eterosexuals or cisgender.
Indivious effectively the message that is something dangerous dangerous of gay sex that different conditions should apply.
It’s as you notice the extra donation station on the gay donation door in gay donation to assure the public the wrong guy may not bear.
It’s like if life feels should be seen to punish “Gay” behavior “at the same time as a reward” well. “
The proposed policy is a clear example of indirect discrimination against GBT people.
For all these reasons, countries is linguations to Australia, Chile, The USA, have aduttiated a three month of blood risplish.
The point of abstinence is to cover the time between when someone can be infected with the HIV and when it is shown in tests.
Nucleic acid (nucleic acid testing for blood screen of blood disease refile again a new infection and a month after occurred.
So, the three months for the location currently in place is already much more than enough to reduce the risk to the minimum of bare.
It’s because three months is more than the tga has approved a period of three month reverse for all the GBT people in 2020.
So why does the tga now be asked to increase this period for some GBT people?
The raffle of LifeBlood does not add.
Point to an increase in the new ratory infects, but the reality is that the newspapers edew in anal sex with more partner with more departure and many significant risk.
Scholod has the fault of the fault, saying it found for their attraction of and is the ttu has already approved a period of the three month for spell.
Life’s life is saying sex workers in his TGA’s submission and need a prudence, which one donation of GBT, and that (without any sex reasoning)
I really feel like life life is the catch for the reasons for a policy that knows little sense.
You become clear from my discussions that you are dispursing the current GBT’s effect: there are a gbt increasing number and government to their GBT impassions can donate.
It also looks like how many GBTs can you have plasma donation that doesn’t need a period of sexual abstinence, a route that has been insiggious for many years.
May also want to pick up the sale of Australian blood products you struck the goia ports of doors.
Those of us who were campaigns for the donation of blood and neutral bore can take the heart that our efforts are working.
But there is always a job to do when savergaga life supports a policy that descriminate gbt peoples.
We will go from the countryside will make his or her support of Donor of TGA support but challenging a period of six-month releging and stigmatizing.